The question of the week for week 9 was “How do older forms
of media inform new media markets?” Keeping this in mind while reading the
textbook, I became intrigued over the television market during the first Golden
Age and then the regression of content produced in during the Wasteland period
of television. During my research, I came across several renowned TV critics
discussing what they called “the New Golden Age.” This is what really caused me
to further look into the way the television media market has evolved over the
decades.
To begin to answer the question of the week, I gave a quick
review of the Golden Age and Wasteland of television, which we had discussed in
class earlier that week. To more thoroughly answer the question of the week, I
discussed the New Golden Age, its characters and characteristics, and how the
New Golden Age came to be.
Discussion: After completing my presentation, the main
discussion question that I posed was: Even though there are examples of the New
Golden Age, do you think we are coming out of the TV wasteland at last or
venturing further into the wasteland? My fellow classmates did a good job of
pointing out that while there has been a revival of controversial,
thought-provoking content, which are characteristics of what critics and
scholars describe as the New Golden Age, that there are always going to be
people who prefer to watch reality shows or sitcoms that do not require viewers
to think beyond what is playing on the television.
Sources:
Garrison, Lindsay
H. (2011). ‘Defining Television Excellence “On Its Own Terms”: The Peabody
Awards and Negotiating Discourses of Quality’. Cinema Journal, 50(2), 160-165.
Straubhaar,
Joseph, and Robert Larose. (2008). Media
Now: Understanding Media, Culture and Technology. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth
Company.
"Welcome to
TV's Second "Golden Age"" (2013, October 1). CBSNews. CBS Interactive. Retrieved
October 27, 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment